I used to avidly read reviews in the magazines then I purchased an IC706, the reviewer said this little rig can even be used to listen to your favorite FM Broadcasts when you are out portable. The reviewer was obviously just quoting what the manufactures say in the brochure. I took mine out and about in the Caravan for several years, never once did I listen to an FM Broadcast. It received them yes, but several at the same time,it was rubbish.
This of course reflected in the overall performance in the Amateur Bands. 144MHz for instance is either deaf (pre amp off) or cross modulation and image reception is rife (pre amp on).
Reviews of rigs are very often a copy of the manufacturers claims. This can be seen in anything that uses the AD9850 DDS module with claims of performance to 40MHz even 60MHz, reviewers are just blindly copying the lies from far eastern EBay suppliers.
Then there was a revue of a commercial doublet with balanced line feeder and an unun to coax which became famous for catching fire. The Reader / Reviewer got some odd results in his test. He had mounted the feed point at the top of an aluminium mast and taped the balanced line all the way down the pole.
There is definitely a financial arrangement involved in some reviews.
Now we have the Blogger reviewer breed, he sees a new rig copies and pastes the photo and talks about the spec and performance, good and bad points, having never seen one.
There is also the Kit Builder who puts on his rose coloured glasses having built summut what werks at last and tells you all the wonderful things it does having never tested the thing properly. The thing can have major problems he doesn’t notice and he will quote not only performance he has not tried and will repeat absolutely impossible performance claims from some pie in the sky it ‘might even be able to’ speculation as fact.
Technical information from the clueless.
I am afraid now all reviews get from me is a glance at the photo’s.